***Videos 1 and 2 are both re-done***
I hesitate posting these videos...I find my own voice irritating. I hope these are somewhat helpful, though. You may come across unbelievers who accuse evangelicals of being "selectively" literal when they read the Bible. Perhaps you've read the Passion accounts and wondered how it is that Jesus could celebrate Passover on a Thursday night and then see John's record stating Jesus was crucified on the Preparation Day of Passover...isn't that the day they slaughter the lambs for Passover? How could Jesus partake of the Passover and then die before He partook?
These topics came up by way of a You Tuber going by the moniker "PropMTH". He gets thousands and thousands of views per vid. He basically regurgitated Bart Ehrman's observations (here's his vid), which seemed to add to the practicality of making a response...which turned into two videos. The first one primarily deals with the notion of "literalist" hermeneutics...the second deals with the the apparent contradiction between John and the synoptics. It's a total of twenty minutes worth of your time. If you were to choose one, and not the other, I'd recommend beginning with the second one even though it is a direct continuation from the first.
Many thanks go out to Turretin Fan for linking me up to a book called A Harmony of the Gospels edited by A.T. Robertson (that link is to google books...they have most of the book on there for free). Besides a helpful discussion of Preparation Day, this book addresses another difficulty with clarity I haven't seen anyone else use...why is it John seemed to think Jesus was crucified at a different time than Mark? I'll give you the answer, but I'd encourage you to read up on it. John wrote his Gospel to non-Jews well after the destruction of the temple...his audience followed the Roman way of keeping time...and A.T. Robertson doesn't pose this as a mere possibility, I'm convinced of it as John freely referred to evening as being part of the same day...and not the beginning of another day (remember, Jews followed a lunar calendar which means the evening marked the beginning of a new day)...that is to say, John converted the events to the Roman way of keeping time. Very interesting stuff, and it's amazing to think it takes current scholarship to muck everything up.
Here's Video 1...I did the video over again. It is shorter, easier to follow, and has different visuals:
Here's Video 2...this one is also easier to follow (in my opinion)...and it shows my mad photo "enhancing" skills:
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

6 comments:
Thanks for the credit, though I had not expected it! Nice post!
Glad you liked the post...and I know you didn't expect any credit...truth is, I had never used google books before. I found several other sources as a result of your link.
Now I'm able find other sources that otherwise I wouldn't have had access to.
Spectacular representation of part two. I liked the harmony presented by Robertson from watching this series so much I'm going to get a copy. Thanks for making this, it was extremely educational.
"it was extremely educational."
Ahem. Educational as in what? Who received some knowledge here and what might it have been?
How, might I ask, is one 'educated' by reading the Bible? Seems to me that what one 'gets' after reading the Bible is a confused, disjointed travelogue of the bumbling ancient Israelites.
Am I missing something?
Psalm 19:7-9
The law of the LORD is perfect, converting the soul;The testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple; The statutes of the LORD are right, rejoicing the heart; The commandment of the LORD is pure, enlightening the eyes; The fear of the LORD is clean, enduring forever; The judgments of the LORD are true and righteous altogether.
1 Corinthians 1:18
For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.
...apparently not.
Post a Comment